
A man and an angel fighting.

I can't tell. Geometric designs of some sort.

The ancient Egyptians were sun-worshipers. They believed their monarchs to be the decendents of Horus the solar deity. The man and woman are wearing a Pharonic crown (which itself is a combonation of the crowns of the former kingdoms of Upper Egypt and Lower Egypt, united by the conquests of a pharoah whose name has been lost to history.) The babies have freaky heads because that's how Egyptian art almost always depicts babies. Human-drawing in ancient Egypt was crude, and that's how the artists got the point across that these are babies--by giving them exaggeratedly large heads.

On the left, a woman is being kidnapped. The tall guy is presumably the leader of the kidnappers. On the right, a large animal seems to be bowing to a man in a chair.

This doesn't match up with typical Egyptian artwork of the time. It's way too rough/simplistic. I'd say it was never finished, and I'd say it's a bird.

Appears to be a fish deity. With wings. There have been stranger.

I'd like to see the original engraving, not a "reconstructed pencil drawing."

They look like angels to me.

I don't know much about Sumerian iconology. I would say that it's a bird man picture being judged by some authority. :shrug:

It's Jesus ascending into Heavan. And?

The star of Bethlehem, perhaps?

A man fighting a monster. Standard fare.

It's a squid! What the Hell does this have to do with anything?

The mural is so faded, and the picture of the mural so low-resolution, that it's hard to say what this is. The shape of the head puts me in mind of an ibis, which in turn puts me in mind of the ibis-headed Egyptian deities Thoth and Isis. In any case, the fact that this figure is BELOW everyone else puts its status as a space alien in doubt.

This was a common practice in precolumbian times among certain American tribes. Bind up a baby's skull and flatten it out. Just like modern folks put braces on childrens' teeth to straighten them out.

Medival mural depicting dark clouds in the background.

The Christian God lives in Heaven, correct? So we see His power coming down from heaven and blessing Jesus.

The signiture says "1951" on it. I think it's safe to say that neither Atlantis nor Lemuria was not around in 1951. If these continents every existed anyway, what's that got to do with space aliens? Plato didn't describe any space aliens in Atlantis, at least.

It si a wierd thing amongst many other wierd things. I don't know what it is, and neither do you.

Those look like hats.

Again; that's ancient Egyptian artists depicted babies. Babies have big heads. Simplistic Egyptian painting indicated that fact like this. And why do they have round bellies? Because they are fat royalty!

May I ask where you got this?
[b]Now in Val Camonica, Italy there are large shapes on the ground depicting beings in suits which resemble astronauts dating to about 10,000 BC which can only be seen from sky view... In the Himalayan mountains in Tibet there are gold monoatomic discs which seem to levitate by themselves, dating to 500 BC... and in Iraq there are ancient Babylonian clay pot batteries which still contain the electrodes from around 2,500 BC...
I've never heard of any of that. What's your scource?
Anyway, my opinion on space aliens:
The galaxy is so huge, that it seems absurd to assume that Earth is the only planet with some sort life on it. Consider this, however.
+The odds of a planet within a habitable range from it's sun and having a stable orbit.
+That planet having a single, large moon (this is neccesary for the maintaining of a stable climate. The Moon's gravity is largely what's responsable for the planet not wabbling chaotically like all the others in our solar system.)
+That planet developing monocellular life.
Okay, that doesn't seem to hard. It happened here right? But this is where it gets tricky.
+That planet developing animal life.
This one is infintisimal. Life on Earth could very possibly remained in a pre-animal state had it not been for some very coincidental evolution.
It's also important not to think of evolution as a straight line. "Animal" is not the next natural step up from "plant." It's is simply a different branch of evolution with its own advantages and disadvantages. And ask yourself: are animals really more advanced? We animals cannot produce our own energy; we need to take it from plants via ingestion. Likewise, we reproduce slower. Most animal species don't live as long. We spread over smaller areas. When you step outside in the morning, what do you see more off: animals or plants? It was by a very unusual set of circumstances that any life on earth (and, mind you most life did not) evolved into animals.
Okay, moving on. Next, we have to assume:
+That said animal life develops intelligence.
Again, evolution is not a straight line. It's not "we have animals, and now those animals evolve to become intelligent." Only a few species on Earth have evolved into intelligent organisms. And it's not neccesarilly something that makes them superior to other creatures. Can you honesly say that humans are at a greater evolutionary advantage over roaches? Roaches are less intelligent, but they seem to be far more succesfull as a species; better at surviving, better at reproducing, better at geting food(when was the last time you heard of a roach famine?).
Again, it was a very specific set of circumstances that led to the evolution of intelligent animal life on Earth. Now we must assume that:
+Said intelligent creatures develope technology.
Let's look at how many creatures on earth use tools. Apes, monkeys, humans, otters. How many of those have taken those tools and developed them FURTHER into complex machines? One.
Allright, now, let's assume, after beating all of those near-impossible odds that these intelligent tool-using animals who can make machines use those machines to explore outer space. This is not a given. Many humans today are opposed to the rescources our governments are using to explore space, arguing that all that effort needs to be put towards solving matters at home on Earth. Those of us who are interested in charting the heavens do so out of little more than a romantic thirst for knowledge. What if the aliens don't have that thirst for knowledge? What if they are psychollogically more akin to sheep than monkeys, and are not interested in exploration?
And then, what if they don't have the rescources for exploration? What if their planet doesn't have much metal? What if they have already consumed many of the rescources neccessary to build spacecraft before they try to fly?
Now, lets say all this comes to pass. The aliens evolve into a technologically-advanced civilization and begin to explore outer space.
All this seems possible. After all, we're getting close to it, it seems. So why can't someone else? Here's the problem, though:
+They visit Earth.
Here's a picture of the Milky Way: http://www2.lns.mit.edu/~LQS/Milky_Way_galaxy_sun05.jpg
Look at where our solar system is. Can you even see it? No. We're not even part of a very large star cluster. What would attract the aliens' attention to us? Out of all the trillions of lightyears that make up our galaxy, comeing to earth from a random location in it would be like coming to the pull tab of the can of soda I'm drinking from anywhere in the solar system. And once they're here:
+They visit. They make themselves seen. They leave.
You're telling me that these miraculous creatures spend unimaginably vast rescources to explore the entire galaxy, find Earth, and then DON'T DO ANYTHING? No colonies? No rescource harvesting? Nothing? Where is the profit in this journey? Why come here? They don't want food? Fuel? Territorry? Water? Minerals? Slaves? Outposts? Nothing? Then why bother?
The likelyhood of all this is about 1 out of 1000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000
0000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000.
And no, that's not an exact estimate.
In any case, even if something as incredable as this were to happen, why are the aliens being so secretive? Are they afraid of us? They're obviously far more powerful than us, so that's unlikely. Do they not want to hurt us? How could us merely knowing about them hurt us? And why haven't they caught on to the fact that we're catching on yet?
Sorry, but none of this makes sense to me.
TFairy wrote:I highly doubt that what I just said is the most stupid thing you ever heard.
Maybe aliens are like us, maybe they aren't. I think they are like us, not the same, but similar. They mightn't be as evolved as us either.
Why would people with no genetic connection with us whatsoever look anything like us?











