by Hilde on Wed Jan 23, 2008 5:46 pm
Opera Browser
The Good:
I can actually look at everything without having to scroll to the side!! YEEESSS!
And we actually have a "eye catcher" graphic image in our header!! THANK YOU.
I adore the gaps between posts.
The Bad:
I'm typographically particular. Anal, obsessive compulsive, whatever you'd like to say. That's me. I think the font displaying the 'home title', "Role Playing Games by RolePlayGateway" and the 'tag line', "Role-playing games, their players, and other skills and pastimes associated with role-playing" is disgusting. It's dull, it's pixelated, it's disgusting. In my opinion, leave the 'title' and 'tag line' blank or remove the automatic coding and load a pre-made banner image that doesn't look quite so gross.
Also, before when the page was wider, the gray background didn't quite show up as much. Now that we've adjusted the width, I think that the background should probably change. The problem is that if we have an image heavy, or none boring background, it's going to be difficult to find one that isn't white or black that matches with the switching templates.
We may want to go as far as desiging a completely customized layout for ourselves and have that be our only option, though I know most people don't like that idea. (Even I don't know how I feel about "forcing" a layout.)
This is kind of random, but on the main page, all of our cool groups on other sites (such as flickr, etc)- when you click on the link, they don't open in a new tabe/page. In my opinion it shouldn't take you away from this site, but give you a new option in another window. 'target="_blank"'
The Ugly:
I'm not insulting anyone, but I strongly dislike the logo. I think it needs to be more prominent, it's having severe font issues, and I don't like how the dark purple gets lost behind the background. Though a simple illumination would fix that, I don't particularly like the background floral thing in the logo either.
I'm going to say this again- this logo was thrown together, I understand that. Dovey and I, respectively, have both done some logo work- probably others as well, and nothing seems to mesh. And so something got thrown together and this is the result.
Logo aside, I still think there should be more images, or graphics, that don't include "soft pornography" around the site. I've myself have taken a few pictures that we didn't end up using, several people have given ideas and actual mock ups to artists and nothing seems to actually come of it. I think the audience we are trying to reach doesn't necessarily dislike 2.0, but by it's very nature 2.0 is bland. You can easily spice up a web 2.0 layout by adding a few graphics and the like.
Other than that, it's clean, it's practical, and organized.
A+
Other Browsers
The navigation, response time, load times, and functions seem to be fine in Firefox 2.0 and IE 7.0 browsers as well due to Eric's excellent coding abilities.