Kouketsu wrote:What I am confused about is what you mean by the 'culture' behind them. I've always been of the opinion that identifying oneself with a subculture as a result of the music one listens to is kinda silly, you know? I just have a tough time letting the music I choose to listen to and the way that those musicians present themselves define my identity on even the slightest level. I look at it somewhat in the same way that I look at people letting their nationality define their identity (Although that is something we cannot alter), but the principle is the same in that we are individuals not bound to the customs and traditions that are really there as a side-effect more than a driving force.
With that said, I also don't view these as opposing forces by any stretch of the imagination or even all that different and I enjoy both immensely. To the point that I've been musically involved in each in the past personally (Among many other things) and loved it. Music is music, and there's way too much of it that's good for me to stick to one genre or another.
Well, by culture, its quite obvious the culture behind each music is different, be it regional or simply personal, the culture mindset and thought behind each one is completely different. I'm not telling you to chose one, so much as if you are in either one why? And which one out of the two would you prefer.
Riverstyx777 wrote:Anybody who knows me will know that I am a rocker through and through. To be honest, I nearly despise hip-hop/rap, or whatever it is called these days. I said that I nearly, but not completely, despise it. Why? Well, for one, most hip-hop/rap does not focus on real music. Yes, they can speak poetically and in rhythm, but they do not actually sing, for the most part. Also, they only give the rapper the credit, not the band playing the music for him to rap to. That is why I believe the hip-hop genre is not exactly a true form of music. If this makes me sound like a close-minded prick, I apologize, but this is merely my own opinion. You may have your own opinions, and I will respect them, even if I disagree.
From the cultural aspect of either genre, I believe rock wins out yet again. Rock offers a very broad range of cultures; be it a dark metal outlook, maybe a more pop/techno feel, or just a downhome bluesy sense. What does hip-hop offer? Gangster outlooks, mainly, though that is probably me grasping at stereotypes more than anything else. I cannot claim to know much about hip-hop, I do not even know who the hip-hop artists mentioned in this thread are... Eh, I seem to be quite hypocritical in my mindless nuances, though I was only attempting to voice my opinion fairly, without much bias.
My problem with this is the following sections
"Well, for one, most hip-hop/rap does not focus on real music. Yes, they can speak poetically and in rhythm, but they do not actually sing, for the most part."
MOST hip-hop is quite music, its all where you look, dont just observe the surface, dig deeper. And their speaking poetically and in rhythm is quite musical AND difficult(I would know being a rapper/ poet for 4 years now)
"Also, they only give the rapper the credit, not the band playing the music for him to rap to. That is why I believe the hip-hop genre is not exactly a true form of music."
They do not just give the rapper the credit, for instance, on Lupe Fiascos first album "Food & Liquor" the last song titled "Outro" Gives thanks and credit to all the people who worked on his album, particularly the producers of the music.
They are given credit, if they werent, Just Blaze, Soundtrakk, Pro and Zaytoven wouldn't exist or be rich.
And I can understand the cultural outlook, the problem with Hip-Hop culture, is its cryptic and hard to understand, almost like another language, on the surface it looks grungy and violent, but under that jacket is a complicated(and I'll admit somewhat twisted) system of honor valor bravery and strength that some cant understand(among other things.)