Sepokku wrote:mombie wrote:Yet, you can't bother to check suggestions or read through anything else to see that Rem forced private Universes into hiding when that was not desired by GMs. How can you claim that they are a privilege to be treated differently from others when you don't even know the full story?
It is slightly ironic that you as well haven't bothered to check or read through anything to see that CS can be removed from a RP. Instead, you attack people without knowing the full story, in multiple threads that are trying to work on fixing an issue...
And once more, I can't really be blamed for dropping out of an inactive Universe, even if the universe eventually got off the ground. Not all of us have a set and predictable irl schedule. If I joined an Rp, it is because I had time for it when I joined, not because I had time for it many months later when it finally starts. By your same logic I should have gotten a formal notice of MIA from the GMs of the aforementioned games. However, I never did, and assumed bowing out in the same way that they did was acceptable. None of those GMs seem to care/hold a grudge, so why do you...
You can go ahead and indulge yourself with this topic:
pay-attention-roleplay-tags-t112550.htmlHere, no one, including REM himself, states that a GM can remove CS from an RP. So, I guess you're really reaching for straws here, dude. Enjoy eating your own words. Instead of telling members that CS can, indeed, be deleted/removed, he just gave the ability to have a private function. I guess that means, by proxy, that even Rem has no idea how his site works. Neither do any of the other staff. Mjolnir knows. Okay, that's ONE person out of a bunch of people that do not.
You've got a real issue. You're a nasty gaslighter, and you really twist people's words to fit your narrative. I notice that you don't really respond to my actual points unless you can contort them into your own words.
You
can be blamed for dropping out of Universes, especially for not having enough patience to see a Universe be completed before it started. You ghost out on almost everything you join for one reason or the other. You're one of the names that a good bit of us bring up to not want in our RPs for your inability to commit. You don't think these GMs hold a grudge, but maybe they aren't willing to tell it like it is. We remember the ghosters, especially the ones that do it over and over.
Just in case you can't read a whole thread (much like you can't seem to read a front page to see how many players/characters are there) I will drop off a few quotes from that former thread regarding the removal of CS from Universes. You will see that neither admin nor staff say whether or not CS can already be deleted, but imply that CS should not be deleted/removed but left in a limbo with a PM from the GM to the player of that CS. So, I guess you can say that NO ONE really knew of this feature, and that included people here for years (like Nemesia) and staff. 'Cept for Mjolnir, and that's just because they knew of this before when the feature was one click away in a navigation bar. Now it's no longer like that.
Peace out.
LawOfTheLand wrote:We already offer this feature of only allowing a certain number of characters via requiring GM approval of characters before they can play in a universe. Once the limit has been reached, all further submissions should be kept in limbo and then approved in the eventuality that one of the original players goes missing for a while in order to keep the activity rolling. Remæus refers to this as having a low "bus factor," which is an informal measure of how severely activity would be affected if one of the players were to be hit by a bus.
It is the GM's responsibility to keep players informed on these matters. Those being kept in a holding pattern should receive a politely worded PM explaining the situation so they don't waste their time waiting on a response and can go on to play somewhere else until a spot opens up.
I'm interested to know what you mean by a "spam CS" though. Could you link some examples so myself and my team know what to look for?
Nemeseia wrote:No worries, mombie. Sometimes I don't make sense in my writing and it gets difficult to convey things.
And thanks for the help! I apologize if this came off as cranky or rude or whathaveyou. That wasn't my intention at all; I was simply just trying to see if, maybe, something could be done about giving GM's the option to completely delete a character, especially for those of us who do private roleplays or 1x1's!
It would make life so much easier, and RPG is a state of everchanging organized--or in some cases disorganized--chaos! Still wouldn't really trade it for anything in the world.
Nemeseia wrote:I think that's the reason they gave us the option for OPEN and REQUIRE APPROVAL options so that we could control which characters were accepted, and which ones were not. As a way to give the GM control to which characters suited their universe--or even in some cases accept characters they personally liked.
All of the universes that I have created with my writing partner are active in a sense. We go through them one or two at a time. Take the Fire Emblem one, for example. That one has nearly two hundred posts alone, with Pokemon being our second active one, although we both had a mutual agreement that our Fire Emblem roleplay will be scrapped and revamped.
We should have the option to completely delete a character and remove them from the universe, period. As someone who used to do OPEN roleplays, it used to be that even with reservations, people were still allowed to submit characters for the same role as a means of competition. GM's would simply choose whichever one they liked best.
TL;DR
GM's should be given the ability to delete a character. Period. Or at least be given the option to remove that character permanently so that it does not show up as a character that is part of the universe and so that it doesn't appear in the character drop down menu if it so happens to start with a J and your character starts with a J.