Tips: 0.00 INK
by Tramp on Fri Nov 23, 2007 1:18 pm
Here's a warning about my style of 'creative' criticism. It tends to be harsh as possible without being dead right insulting--or blatantly, dead right insulting at least. Moreover, I speak with the experience of a reader. Between you and me, that's not saying much. So, don't go thinking everything or anything I say is correct. Or read this at all. But if you're still reading, without further ado:
Potential. That single word symbolizes a wealth of criticisms by its own right. It's a word commonly associated with the better stories and also a word that authors never want associated with finished writing. Your prologue, as I've read it so far, shows a whole lot of (you guessed it!) potential. You seem to be starting a lovely world, and whether the richness of your imagination will be capitalized or not... you pretty much know where this is heading. For example, your prologue is a stable beginning as novels go. Stable, as in the roughest definition of the word. It seems to be almost solid, but not quite.
For one thing, the hook that grabs the readers' attention seems to be lacking... too short of a hook perhaps, or maybe a hook not sharpened. Relying on just the technique of dotting the page with "he" isn't a strong enough hook by itself. Don't take me wrong though; withholding the protagonist's name is a good method to emphasize the hooking, however not strong enough by itself. My advice is to try a more action packed approach, of say... R.A. Salvatoreâs Drizzt DoâUrden novels. Perhaps youâve heard of them. Salvatore has interesting openings. One method tends to pit a hero in immediate danger and suddenly dangles a cliffhanger before the first chapter to later return to the action or leave it out completely instead and have the hero return to tell his tale. Another method offers a more doomsday bearing feel, and shows the immense power of an antagonist as well as the villain plotting against the hero. Not regarding Salvatore altogether, the key to prologues in fantasy books seem to be suspense. Think of the whole prologue as the hook. Maybe youâre already thinking along those lines except you might want to show it better so amateur readers like me can see it before we stop reading.
The second thing I would like to point out is the amount of information youâre dumping into the fantasy-styled tale. By âtaleâ, I mean prologue. Between you and me, I often skip prologues. Itâs a bad habit I grew into after a lifetime of forced mundane reading assignmentsâkey phrase is âgetting to the endâ. For typical readers that pick up fantasy books, I would imagine theyâre feeding that thirst for engulfing actionâthink something along the lines of video games, but with good storylines. Nobody reads the Silmarillion (J.R.R. Tolkienâs Bible-like approach on the history of his world) yet everybody has already read The Lord of the Rings trilogy. Moreover, as I have mentioned before, I often skip prologues unless theyâre interesting. That means hording the background and the history of the world in the prologue is not such a wonderful idea, save for one example: that the prologue was made especially and only for the purpose to introduce the world. Which takes skill to execute and combines background with some doomsday bearing suspense. Yours, on the other hand, attempts to combine pieces of both approaches (history and action) into a floundering bore of an opening.
I repeat myself regular, as you may have noticed now. Your storyline shows lots of potential, and so does your skill as a writer. I havenât been meaning to badger your ability to write in my criticisms, even as it could have been translated as so. I mean, look at this mess of a criticism. Itâs horrible. I canât write worth pennies glued to the floor; thatâs precisely why I found my way here. But you honestly show much potential, and here are my closing words for an inspiring writer:
Show, not tell. ClichĂ©d, yes, but a valuable lesson to learn that many miss in their pursuit of literature mastery. For clarityâs sake, try to inject characteristics as subtly as possible. Instead of announcing of how the Akaviran Clan is shunned for their dark skin and spoken of in whispers, mention the protagonist seeing a child Akaviran asking her mother why people react so stranger to her and what certain words mean. Cute and heartbreaking at the same time, see?
Base the fantasy on reality. Youâve mentioned about 400 pages of bonding, but donât just assume a big book keeps a person feeling any connection to the main character. Moreover, secondary characters (or even any wandering merchant) in the tale are not expendable NPCs that only know two phrases. Ground them heavily on humanistic faults. Our personality is based fully on the experience of our life. If a character is born into wealth, handles swords well, he is probably a cocky show-off who never felt the pain of a superior or he is a lonely, angry child who sweated for his rough skills in defiance of his lack of parental love. In fact, people tend to be 80% imperfect and 20% alright-ness, and the sense of perfect comes from the skill an individual has to hide his imperfections.
And thatâs basically everything I can think of⊠good luck with life.
Edit: Wow. Compared with Circ's response, I'm quite an ass. And one that has no life... Sigh.
Knock, knock. That's what she said, mind you. And that's all she said, if you know what I'm talking about! And if you do, would you kindly tell me? Because I sure don't.
Tip jar: the author of this post has received
0.00 INK
in return for their work.