Moderators: dealing with it, Ambassadors
Tip jar: the author of this post has received 0.00 INK in return for their work.
Tip jar: the author of this post has received 0.00 INK in return for their work.
Tip jar: the author of this post has received 0.00 INK in return for their work.
Fallacy wrote:Oh, and the whole "promoting pedophilia" argument is just dumb.
Tip jar: the author of this post has received 0.00 INK in return for their work.
Mr_Doomed wrote:Fallacy wrote:Oh, and the whole "promoting pedophilia" argument is just dumb.
Would you be so kind as to explain?
Oh and I just noticed the poll seems a little one sided.
Tip jar: the author of this post has received 0.00 INK in return for their work.
Tip jar: the author of this post has received 0.00 INK in return for their work.
Tip jar: the author of this post has received 0.00 INK in return for their work.
Rulke wrote:I'd argue that freedom of speech, even if I don't agree with it, is positive and or neutral comment. As you believe enough in freedom of speech not to limit it.
Tip jar: the author of this post has received 0.00 INK in return for their work.
Fallacy wrote:Rulke wrote:I'd argue that freedom of speech, even if I don't agree with it, is positive and or neutral comment. As you believe enough in freedom of speech not to limit it.
That poll option implies that you don't like the advertisement, but think that they have a right to air it. One-sided.
Tip jar: the author of this post has received 0.00 INK in return for their work.
Tip jar: the author of this post has received 0.00 INK in return for their work.
Tip jar: the author of this post has received 0.00 INK in return for their work.
Mid wrote:...What the hell did that ad have to do with air conditioners? Do not get.
And I can see where it gives that "pedobear" vibe. The fact that the girl and the woman are almost the same (hair, face, clothing, etc) can make one wonder...is this guy really looking at the girl as a woman and not a child? In his own perverted mind, of course.
Tip jar: the author of this post has received 0.00 INK in return for their work.
LynIsMe wrote:It really has absolutely zilch to do with any sort of A/C. Even if it is supposed to be two temeperatures (hot and not-hot?) on each side.
Tip jar: the author of this post has received 0.00 INK in return for their work.
Fallacy wrote:LynIsMe wrote:It really has absolutely zilch to do with any sort of A/C. Even if it is supposed to be two temeperatures (hot and not-hot?) on each side.
Since when do advertisements usually have anything to do with the product that's being advertised? At least there's actually a fairly strong connection with this one.
Tip jar: the author of this post has received 0.00 INK in return for their work.
Tip jar: the author of this post has received 0.00 INK in return for their work.
Tip jar: the author of this post has received 0.00 INK in return for their work.
Leli wrote:I didn't hear about this add, and although yes it isn't tasteful at all, I find it hilarious. Everything is censored now, you can't breath without some tight prick taking offence to the way you did it. So, as far as I'm concerned although it's distasteful there's no reason not to publish it. If enough of the public raised a huff about it I'm pretty sure it would be taken out of circulation anyway.
Tip jar: the author of this post has received 0.00 INK in return for their work.
Tip jar: the author of this post has received 0.00 INK in return for their work.
RPG relies exclusively on user donations to support the platform.
Donors earn the "Contributor" achievement and are permanently recognized in the credits. Consider donating today!
Users browsing this forum: No registered users and 1 guest